Content warning: This article discusses the discovery of Nicole Fitts's body and the disappearance of her young daughter, Arianna. We avoid graphic detail and do not speculate about what happened.
Quick Context
This evidence analysis examines what public reporting and agency statements say about the plywood board, the McLaren Park crime scene, and investigative searches in the Nicole Fitts case. SFPD case ID 160289073 remains open; Arianna is still missing, and we found no public report that anyone has been charged. This is the evidence-focused companion to our case breakdown and case preview. (Sources: SFPD; FBI)
Current as of November 11, 2026. We reviewed agency pages and contemporaneous reporting, not the full investigative file. A public statement about evidence is not the same as access to the underlying evidence, laboratory reports, or case records.
At a Glance
- ✔Plywood: Police said the person who buried Nicole brought the board to the scene. It had spray-painted markings, described by NBC Bay Area as a possible logo that police wanted the public to identify. The marking's meaning has not been publicly established. (Sources: SFPD; NBC Bay Area, April 21, 2016)
- ✔Crime scene: Recreation and Parks workers found Nicole in a shallow grave at McLaren Park on April 8, 2016. Public reporting described a plywood board over the grave. (Sources: SFPD; NBC Bay Area, April 21, 2016)
- ✔Clothing and sighting: Nicole was last reported seen on the T-Third corridor at about 9:45 p.m. on April 1, wearing a blue Best Buy shirt with her nametag, beneath a jacket. (Sources: SFist, April 22, 2016; NBC Bay Area, April 21, 2016)
- ✔Searches: Reporting described warrants and evidence collection in Oakland, Emeryville, and Daly City. A May 2016 report also said investigators followed leads in Southern California. (Sources: SFist, April 22, 2016; SFist, May 19, 2016)
- ✔"30,000" reporting: SFist reported more than 30,000 pieces of evidence seized; NBC Bay Area described investigators as working through more than 30,000 pieces of information. Those are not identical descriptions, and the public sources do not establish that every item was a forensic exhibit. (Sources: SFist, April 22, 2016; NBC Bay Area, April 21, 2016)
- ✔Reward: A $10,000 reward for Arianna's safe return was reported on May 18, 2016. SFPD's current case page lists $250,000 for information leading to identification, arrest, and conviction in Nicole's murder and Arianna's disappearance. We could not find a public record explaining when the amount changed. (Sources: SFist, May 19, 2016; SFPD)
- ✔Tip lines: SFPD lists 415-575-4444, text SFPD to 47411, and Homicide at 415-553-1145. (Source: SFPD)
The Crime Scene in McLaren Park
On the morning of April 8, 2016, San Francisco Recreation and Parks workers found Nicole buried in a shallow grave at McLaren Park. Reporting at the time described the grave as hastily dug and the plywood as covering it. SFPD Commander Greg McEachern said Nicole had been "manipulated to fit into the grave." He declined to publicly give her cause of death. (Sources: SFPD; NBC Bay Area, April 21, 2016; SFist, April 22, 2016)
The public description is limited. It does not tell us how long the site had been there, what investigators recovered, or what forensic testing found. We will not use that absence to fill gaps with a theory. The cause of death was not publicly released in the sources we reviewed. (Sources: SFist, April 22, 2016; SFPD)
The Plywood Board and Its Marking
The board is one of the few pieces of physical evidence described publicly in specific terms. At the April 21, 2016 press conference, police said they did not believe it came from the park. McEachern said, "It is our belief that the person brought the board with them," and asked the public to recognize its markings. (Sources: SFist, April 22, 2016; NBC Bay Area, April 21, 2016)
SFist, citing the Associated Press, described "odd spray-painted markings." NBC Bay Area's headline and reporting said police asked the public to help identify a logo spray-painted on the board. These descriptions establish that authorities publicly drew attention to a marking; they do not establish what it depicted or whether anyone recognized it. (Sources: SFist, April 22, 2016; NBC Bay Area, April 21, 2016)
What the public sources say
- ✔Police believed the board was brought to the scene rather than taken from the park. (Source: SFist, April 22, 2016)
- ✔The board carried markings described in reporting as spray-painted and possibly a logo. Police publicly asked for help identifying them. (Sources: SFist, April 22, 2016; NBC Bay Area, April 21, 2016)
- ✔Police displayed photographs of the board and grave at the press conference. (Source: NBC Bay Area, April 21, 2016)
What we did not find in the sources we reviewed
- ✔A public identification of the marking or logo.
- ✔A public record showing whether investigators traced the board to a seller, business, or other source.
- ✔A later public update explaining whether the board produced a lead or what forensic testing, if any, was conducted.
Our analysis: If a board was brought to a location rather than taken from it, that detail may help investigators ask where it came from and who could recognize it. A distinctive mark can be an identification anchor: someone may recognize a logo, a material, or a product type without knowing anything else about a case. But those are investigative possibilities, not findings about who brought the board or why. The public sources do not answer those questions.
The Clothing and the Last Known Sighting
Contemporaneous reporting said Nicole was last seen at about 9:45 p.m. on April 1, 2016, on the T-Third line or along the Third Street corridor. She was described as wearing a bright blue Best Buy uniform shirt with her nametag under her jacket. No later sighting was reported in the accounts we reviewed. (Sources: SFist, April 22, 2016; NBC Bay Area, April 21, 2016)
Police said Nicole had been "summoned by a person known to her." SFPD's current case page says she was lured to meet the babysitter during the time of her disappearance. These official descriptions indicate investigators were examining a meeting arranged with someone known to Nicole; they do not publicly establish exactly how the meeting was arranged or what happened after she was last seen. (Sources: NBC Bay Area, April 21, 2016; SFPD)
The Evidence Seizures: What "30,000" Does and Does Not Mean
Early reporting described a large evidence collection connected to locations where Arianna was thought to have been staying. SFist reported that police had executed search warrants and seized more than 30,000 pieces of evidence in Oakland, Emeryville, and Daly City. NBC Bay Area, reporting the day before, said investigators were working through more than 30,000 pieces of information. The difference in wording matters. (Sources: SFist, April 22, 2016; NBC Bay Area, April 21, 2016)
We cannot verify from those reports whether "pieces" meant seized physical items, investigative information, or a mix of evidence and leads. So the careful statement is this: contemporaneous sources reported a figure above 30,000, but used different descriptions of what was counted. We should not turn that into a claim that police collected 30,000 forensic exhibits, nor assume every item related to the plywood. (Sources: SFist, April 22, 2016; NBC Bay Area, April 21, 2016)
A May 2016 report said investigators also followed leads in Southern California. That same reporting said the FBI was assisting on the kidnapping investigation and offering profiling services. These details show the geographic and interagency scope described publicly at the time, but do not reveal what any search recovered or what leads were substantiated. (Source: SFist, May 19, 2016)
For a cold-case review, a large number of reported items or information leads is a starting point, not an explanation. The meaningful questions are what each item represents, where it came from, how it was documented, and whether it connects to a verified timeline. Those answers require case records that are not described in the public reporting we reviewed.
The Reward Timeline
The reward figures refer to different moments and stated purposes. On May 18, 2016, SFPD announced a $10,000 reward for Arianna's safe return to her family, as reported the following day by SFist. (Source: SFist, May 19, 2016)
SFPD's case page currently lists a $250,000 reward for information leading to the identification, arrest, and conviction of the person or people responsible for Nicole's murder and Arianna's disappearance. We could not find a public record establishing when the amount increased from the 2016 reward or detailing the change. These amounts should not be conflated: one is the 2016 reward reported for Arianna's safe return; the current SFPD page describes a reward tied to identification, arrest, and conviction in both cases. (Sources: SFist, May 19, 2016; SFPD)
What the Evidence Doesn't Tell Us
The public record leaves core questions unanswered. These are gaps in what we found publicly, not proof that investigators have no answers.
- ✔Cause of death: SFPD Commander Greg McEachern declined to release it in 2016. We found no later public disclosure in the sources reviewed. (Source: SFist, April 22, 2016)
- ✔The marking: We found no public identification of the plywood marking or logo. (Sources: NBC Bay Area, April 21, 2016; SFPD)
- ✔The board's origin: Police said they believed it was brought to the scene, but the sources reviewed do not say whether its source was identified. (Source: SFist, April 22, 2016)
- ✔The seizures: We found no public inventory or accounting that resolves whether the reported 30,000 referred to evidence items, information, or both. (Sources: SFist, April 22, 2016; NBC Bay Area, April 21, 2016)
- ✔Arianna's whereabouts: Police said Arianna was last seen in February 2016; the FBI still lists her as missing. We found no public account establishing what happened to her between that last sighting and the investigation that followed. (Sources: NBC Bay Area, April 21, 2016; FBI)
- ✔Charges: We found no public report that anyone has been charged. No person should be treated as responsible based on suspicion, reporting about investigative attention, or a lack of cooperation. (Sources: NBC Bay Area, April 21, 2016; SFist, May 19, 2016)
Why the Plywood May Still Matter
Our analysis: Physical evidence can remain useful even when public appeals are years old. A board's markings, material, or source might be recognizable to someone who saw a similar item at work, in a storage area, or in a particular setting. That does not mean any specific business or person is connected to this case; it means a concrete object can give investigators and the public a focused question to revisit.
The mark's value, if any, depends on facts not available in the public record: whether it was legible, whether it was documented in sufficient detail, whether it could be linked to a source, and whether any resulting lead was checked. We cannot answer those questions from press conference coverage.
The most responsible public contribution is not to guess at a logo or identify a person online. It is to pass relevant information directly to investigators. A tip may be small, but it can be checked against records the public has never seen.
Do You Have Information?
Anyone with information about Nicole Fitts's murder or Arianna Fitts's disappearance should contact SFPD. Reference case ID 160289073. (Source: SFPD)
- ✔SFPD Tip Line: 415-575-4444
- ✔Text-A-Tip: Text SFPD to 47411
- ✔SFPD Homicide: 415-553-1145
- ✔If you believe you have seen Arianna or have an immediate safety concern: Call 911. (Sources: SFPD; SFist, April 22, 2016)
What We Still Don't Know
- ✔Was the plywood marking ever identified, and did it produce a verified lead?
- ✔Was the board's source established?
- ✔What did the reported evidence collection consist of, and how was the "30,000" figure counted?
- ✔What findings, if any, have investigators publicly confirmed from the searches and forensic work?
- ✔What happened to Arianna after her last reported sighting in February 2016?
- ✔When did the reward amount change, and what public announcement documented that change?
Listen to the Episode
Listen to Season 3, Episode 5: "The Case of Nicole and Arianna Fitts". For the case history and timeline, read the companion breakdown. For the shorter overview, start with the case preview.
Frequently Asked Questions
What evidence was found in the Nicole Fitts case?
Public reporting describes a shallow grave in McLaren Park, a plywood board with spray-painted markings, and Nicole's blue Best Buy shirt with her nametag as part of the last-sighting information. Reporting also described searches and a large evidence or information collection, but the public sources use different wording for the reported figure of more than 30,000. (Sources: SFist, April 22, 2016; NBC Bay Area, April 21, 2016)
What was the plywood marking in the Nicole Fitts case?
Police described markings on the board and asked the public to identify them; NBC Bay Area reported that police referred to a possible logo. We found no public source identifying the marking. (Sources: NBC Bay Area, April 21, 2016; SFist, April 22, 2016)
Was the plywood from McLaren Park?
SFPD Commander Greg McEachern said police did not believe the plywood came from the park and believed the person who buried Nicole brought it to the scene. (Source: SFist, April 22, 2016)
What clothing was Nicole Fitts last seen wearing?
Nicole Fitts was reported last seen wearing a bright blue Best Buy uniform shirt with her nametag beneath her jacket. (Source: NBC Bay Area, April 21, 2016)
How many pieces of evidence did police seize in the Nicole Fitts case?
SFist reported that police seized more than 30,000 pieces of evidence, while NBC Bay Area said investigators were working through more than 30,000 pieces of information. The public sources do not resolve whether those descriptions refer to the same count or category. (Sources: SFist, April 22, 2016; NBC Bay Area, April 21, 2016)
Where did police execute search warrants in the Nicole Fitts investigation?
Contemporaneous reporting listed Oakland, Emeryville, and Daly City, and a later report said investigators also followed leads in Southern California. (Sources: SFist, April 22, 2016; SFist, May 19, 2016)
What is the reward in the Nicole Fitts case?
SFPD's current case page lists a $250,000 reward for information leading to identification, arrest, and conviction in Nicole Fitts's murder and Arianna Fitts's disappearance. A separate $10,000 reward for Arianna's safe return was reported in May 2016. (Sources: SFPD; SFist, May 19, 2016)
Has anyone been charged in the Nicole Fitts case?
We found no public report that anyone has been charged in connection with Nicole Fitts's murder or Arianna Fitts's disappearance. Anyone who has not been convicted is presumed innocent. (Sources: SFPD; FBI)
What do we still not know about the evidence in the Nicole Fitts case?
The public sources do not identify the plywood marking, establish the board's source, explain the reported 30,000 figure, or disclose the cause of death. We also did not find a public inventory of evidence or forensic findings. (Sources: SFist, April 22, 2016; NBC Bay Area, April 21, 2016)
How can I submit a tip about Nicole Fitts or Arianna Fitts?
You can call SFPD's tip line at 415-575-4444, text "SFPD" to 47411, or call SFPD Homicide at 415-553-1145 and reference case ID 160289073. Call 911 if you believe you have seen Arianna or there is an immediate safety concern. (Sources: SFPD; SFist, April 22, 2016)
More From The Last Known Moment
- ✔Case Preview: The Case of Nicole and Arianna Fitts
- ✔Case Breakdown: The Case of Nicole and Arianna Fitts
- ✔Listen to Season 3, Episode 5
Sources
1. San Francisco Police Department: Nicole Fitts case page, case ID 160289073
2. SFist, "Slain SF Mom Was Buried Beneath Board Covered In 'Odd Spray-Painted Markings'" (April 22, 2016)
3. NBC Bay Area: "SFPD Asks For Help Identifying Logo Spraypainted on Board Used to Bury Mother of Missing Toddler" (April 21, 2016)
5. KTVU: "SF police release new details in case of missing 2YO girl, her slain mom"
6. FBI: Arianna Fitts wanted/missing-person page
7. FOX5 Las Vegas: "FBI search for missing girl leads to Las Vegas Valley" (December 2024)
8. The Charley Project: Arianna Fitts
Disclaimer: This article is based on publicly available reporting and agency information reviewed for this post. We do not have access to the complete investigative file, and a missing public record does not mean that a record does not exist. No one has been charged in the sources we reviewed; anyone not convicted is presumed innocent. This post is informational, not legal advice, and uses AI-assisted research and production tools. NaturalQueen77 TV strives for accuracy but cannot guarantee completeness.
Subscribe for independent, victim-centered case coverage: Join us through the NaturalQueen77 TV homepage.
NaturalQueen77 TV
True Crime — Told Responsibly
This article is based on publicly available information and is for educational and informational purposes only. NaturalQueen77 TV strives for accuracy but cannot guarantee completeness. Content warnings are provided where applicable.